In late August 2014, after suffering a defeat in the Supreme Court Hobby Lobby decision when the Court held that business corporations are “persons” that can “exercise religion,” the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) proposed new rules defining “eligible organizations.” Purportedly designed to accommodate the Hobby Lobby ruling, the proposed rules do not comport with the reasoning of that important decision and they unjustifiably seek to permit only a small group of business corporations to be exempt from providing contraceptive coverage on religious grounds. This comment letter to the HHS about its proposed rules makes several theoretical and practical points about the Hobby Lobby holding and how the proposed rules fail to re...
Courts have given corporations personhood for rights like freedom of speech, but are business entiti...
Article published in the Michigan State University School of Law Student Scholarship Collection
In the paradigmatic case of conscientious objection, the objector claims that his religion forbids h...
This comment letter was submitted by U.C. Berkeley corporate law professors in response to a request...
In late August 2014, after suffering a defeat in the Supreme Court Hobby Lobby decision when the Cou...
Did you ever expect a corporation to have a conscience, when it has no soul to be damned, and no bod...
Following the Supreme Court\u27s decision to vacate and remand the cases in Zubik v. Burwell, the De...
Does a business corporation constitute a “person” that can “exercise religion” under the Religious F...
This Comment aims to break free of the limiting religious-secular dichotomy by proposing a “quasi-re...
In Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, Inc., the Supreme Court held, for the first time, that the Religious Free...
Earlier this term, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in the consolidated case of H...
Once known merely as an arts-and-crafts chain, Hobby Lobby now holds a special place in American leg...
We evaluate the U.S. Supreme Court’s controversial decision in the Hobby Lobby case from the perspec...
The Affordable Care Act Contraception Mandate was implemented so that companies would be required to...
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) effected numerous changes in the legal regime g...
Courts have given corporations personhood for rights like freedom of speech, but are business entiti...
Article published in the Michigan State University School of Law Student Scholarship Collection
In the paradigmatic case of conscientious objection, the objector claims that his religion forbids h...
This comment letter was submitted by U.C. Berkeley corporate law professors in response to a request...
In late August 2014, after suffering a defeat in the Supreme Court Hobby Lobby decision when the Cou...
Did you ever expect a corporation to have a conscience, when it has no soul to be damned, and no bod...
Following the Supreme Court\u27s decision to vacate and remand the cases in Zubik v. Burwell, the De...
Does a business corporation constitute a “person” that can “exercise religion” under the Religious F...
This Comment aims to break free of the limiting religious-secular dichotomy by proposing a “quasi-re...
In Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, Inc., the Supreme Court held, for the first time, that the Religious Free...
Earlier this term, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in the consolidated case of H...
Once known merely as an arts-and-crafts chain, Hobby Lobby now holds a special place in American leg...
We evaluate the U.S. Supreme Court’s controversial decision in the Hobby Lobby case from the perspec...
The Affordable Care Act Contraception Mandate was implemented so that companies would be required to...
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) effected numerous changes in the legal regime g...
Courts have given corporations personhood for rights like freedom of speech, but are business entiti...
Article published in the Michigan State University School of Law Student Scholarship Collection
In the paradigmatic case of conscientious objection, the objector claims that his religion forbids h...